<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for cyclingfans.com editor blog</title>
	<link>http://cyclingfans.net/editor</link>
	<description>Cycling live coverage and opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cycling live streaming this season and next by CyclingFans on Satellite &#187; Tour of Britain</title>
		<link>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/cycling-live-streaming#comment-14</link>
		<author>CyclingFans on Satellite &#187; Tour of Britain</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/cycling-live-streaming#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] live coverage will get better next year, either online as cyclingfans editor Pete predicts or on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] live coverage will get better next year, either online as cyclingfans editor Pete predicts or on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landis decision by September 22 by editor</title>
		<link>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/landis-decision-by-september-22#comment-11</link>
		<author>editor</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/landis-decision-by-september-22#comment-11</guid>
		<description>MJ, since when is holding French government agencies accountable an "anti-French slur"?  The media may like to play up ideas like "anti-French" or "anti-American" but we'll keep it real here.

This is also not about whether or not France is passionate about bike racing.  Of course it is, as I well know from 18 years of living in France.

I've repeatedly pointed out the faults of the UCI, A.S.O., etc.  But the subject here is French government agencies ahead of the November vote on Pound's replacement.  The question I have for you is:  Why should these agencies not be held accountable?  As one independent French journalist pointed out in 2003, it is interesting that LNDD director Jacques de Ceaurriz "had no recollection" of being summoned to the French Ministry in the middle of the controversy surrounding the alleged ordered non-testing of the French soccer team before the 1998 World Cup, won by France.  There are other examples but more recently there are serious questions about LNDD's relationship with WADA.

It is true, as we've noted before, that Lamour's counterpart in Spain, Jaime Lissavetsky, has questions to answer about their handling of OP.  But Lamour, who was French Minister of SPORT, had a chance to help bring out the broader truth about OP.  When even L'Equipe TV asked Lamour in late 2006 for an update on OP, Lamour responded that he had "no new information" since the ouster of Ullrich, Basso et al on the eve of the 2006 Tour de France!  He either knew the truth but didn't want to share it with the public or he didn't care to know the truth.  Either way, the man who very possibly will replace Dick Pound at WADA had a key role in making OP about cycling and nothing else.

Fortunately, many in France are the first to criticize Lamour, ASO, L'Equipe, etc.  In fact, those most adamant about defending them tend to be furthest away from France.

Let's get the truth out there, demand transparency from all sides, and then we can decide whether or not something is really important.  As it is now, we tend to only have "official versions" of what is going on from government agencies, international and national federations, etc.  We should encourage, not discourage, attempts by journalists to investigate more than just the athletes.  There are so few who dare do so as it is.  Just as few sports journalists want to investigate the athletes they cover, for fear of losing access, few journalists on both sides of the Atlantic are willing to investigate government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MJ, since when is holding French government agencies accountable an &#8220;anti-French slur&#8221;?  The media may like to play up ideas like &#8220;anti-French&#8221; or &#8220;anti-American&#8221; but we&#8217;ll keep it real here.</p>
<p>This is also not about whether or not France is passionate about bike racing.  Of course it is, as I well know from 18 years of living in France.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve repeatedly pointed out the faults of the UCI, A.S.O., etc.  But the subject here is French government agencies ahead of the November vote on Pound&#8217;s replacement.  The question I have for you is:  Why should these agencies not be held accountable?  As one independent French journalist pointed out in 2003, it is interesting that LNDD director Jacques de Ceaurriz &#8220;had no recollection&#8221; of being summoned to the French Ministry in the middle of the controversy surrounding the alleged ordered non-testing of the French soccer team before the 1998 World Cup, won by France.  There are other examples but more recently there are serious questions about LNDD&#8217;s relationship with WADA.</p>
<p>It is true, as we&#8217;ve noted before, that Lamour&#8217;s counterpart in Spain, Jaime Lissavetsky, has questions to answer about their handling of OP.  But Lamour, who was French Minister of SPORT, had a chance to help bring out the broader truth about OP.  When even L&#8217;Equipe TV asked Lamour in late 2006 for an update on OP, Lamour responded that he had &#8220;no new information&#8221; since the ouster of Ullrich, Basso et al on the eve of the 2006 Tour de France!  He either knew the truth but didn&#8217;t want to share it with the public or he didn&#8217;t care to know the truth.  Either way, the man who very possibly will replace Dick Pound at WADA had a key role in making OP about cycling and nothing else.</p>
<p>Fortunately, many in France are the first to criticize Lamour, ASO, L&#8217;Equipe, etc.  In fact, those most adamant about defending them tend to be furthest away from France.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get the truth out there, demand transparency from all sides, and then we can decide whether or not something is really important.  As it is now, we tend to only have &#8220;official versions&#8221; of what is going on from government agencies, international and national federations, etc.  We should encourage, not discourage, attempts by journalists to investigate more than just the athletes.  There are so few who dare do so as it is.  Just as few sports journalists want to investigate the athletes they cover, for fear of losing access, few journalists on both sides of the Atlantic are willing to investigate government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cycling live streaming this season and next by editor</title>
		<link>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/cycling-live-streaming#comment-10</link>
		<author>editor</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/cycling-live-streaming#comment-10</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, all cyclingnews.com is doing is using an embedded player showing the justin.tv feed.  Anyone can do that on his or her own blog.  That of course doesn't make them a broadcaster like wcsn.com or cycling.tv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, all cyclingnews.com is doing is using an embedded player showing the justin.tv feed.  Anyone can do that on his or her own blog.  That of course doesn&#8217;t make them a broadcaster like wcsn.com or cycling.tv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cycling live streaming this season and next by Thom</title>
		<link>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/cycling-live-streaming#comment-9</link>
		<author>Thom</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/cycling-live-streaming#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Cyclingnews.com also picked up the justin.tv feed.  The TOM is doing a great job with the coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyclingnews.com also picked up the justin.tv feed.  The TOM is doing a great job with the coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landis decision by September 22 by MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/landis-decision-by-september-22#comment-8</link>
		<author>MJ Ray</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cyclingfans.net/editor/2007/landis-decision-by-september-22#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Ye gods, why all the anti-French slurs?  France is (and remains) one of the most passionate and plentiful cycle racing countries and is mostly doing well in how it's handling this storm.  There are big questions to ask about how the Canada-based WADA, the Swiss-based UCI and the Spanish investigators are handling doping in sport cases so badly, always allowing anything with a cycling connection to come back to doping-in-cycling and not throwing the spotlight on the footballers and others, so why bash the French so much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ye gods, why all the anti-French slurs?  France is (and remains) one of the most passionate and plentiful cycle racing countries and is mostly doing well in how it&#8217;s handling this storm.  There are big questions to ask about how the Canada-based WADA, the Swiss-based UCI and the Spanish investigators are handling doping in sport cases so badly, always allowing anything with a cycling connection to come back to doping-in-cycling and not throwing the spotlight on the footballers and others, so why bash the French so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
